MODERN TECHNOLOGIES OF MANIPULATION AS INSTRUMENT OF CHANGE OF POLITICAL REALITY ARE IN UKRAINE
In the article examined, that there is a process of political reality constructing by means of the use the various manipulation technologies that allow popularizing "necessary" to the politicians’ ideas that afterwards grow into soil of the counted scenario the political development events. Attention applies on the phenomenon of mythological political life, considered through the prism of social life symbolizing psychological process, illustrates effectiveness of external influence mechanisms on mass consciousness at man. It is underlined that mechanisms of external influence on mass consciousness at man is unchanging sufficiently long time and exist almost so much how many exist human civilization. The role of mass-media is shown as to the instrument of virtualization of the real political space and means of this virtual reality constructing.
Bahdycian, B. (1987). Monopoly means of information. Moscow: Prohress, 320. [in Russian].
Bart, R. (2000). Mixology. (S. N. Zenkyna, Trans.). Moscow: Yzdatel’stvo ym. Sabashnykovykh, 320. [in Russian].
Constitution of Ukraine, 28.06.1996, no. 254k/96-VR. (Redaction at the 30.09.2016). Vidom. Verkhov. Rady Ukrainy. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80/page2. [in Ukrainian].
Diyakova, E. H. (2003). Masson political communication in theory establishing notes the day: to effectto the protest. Polys, 3, 109 – 119. [in Russian].
Fesenko, V. (2005). Elections a part of revolution. “Orange revolution”. Ukraine version. (M. B. Pohrebynskyy, Ed.). Moscow: Yzdatelʹstvo “Europe”, 195–206. [in Russian].
Korniev, V. (2005). Miff as machine languish ousting. Yzv. Altayskoho Hos. UN-ta, 4, 93–99. [in Russian].
Kovaliov, H. (2014). Orange revolution as product mediocrity. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://www.igls.com.ua/dialogs/680/. [in Russian].
Levy-Bryul, L. (2012). Primitive thinking. Moscow: Krasand, 338. [in Russian].
Levy-Stross, K. (2001). Structural anthropology. (V. Yvanova, Trans.). Moscow: ÉKSMO-Press, 512.
Mac Coumbs, M., Show, D. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 36, 2, 176–187. [in English].
Pantyn, Y. K. (2010). “Orange” tablets as risk sickly. Polys, 6, 177–181. [in Russian].
Pocheptsov, H. (2000). Psychological military. Moscow: Refl-buk; Kyiv: Vakler, 528. [in Russian].
Press release on the results of sociological research. (2017). Kiev International Institute of Sociology. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://www.kiis.com.ua/. [in Ukrainian].
Rubtsov, V. (2008). Ukraine Maiden as vicar in standing Ukraine society. Science note Ostroz’koia academy, Serial Polytechnic science, 3, 37–43. [in Ukrainian].
Sobolev, E. (2018). Technologic “Miho-maiden” vocation to show protest loudly as protest Saakashvili in Poroshenko. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://gordonua.com/news/politics/tehnologiya-miho-maydan-prizvana to show protest loudly as protesting Saakashvili to Poroshenko Ehor Sobolev-22 1162.html. [in Russian].
Tkachuk, A. (2014). “Revolution hidnosti”: politological analyze. Visnyk L’viv’s university. Philosophy politological study. L’viv: LNU named. I. Franko, 5, 323–327. [in Ukrainian].
Yamel'nyts'kyy, O. Y. (2014). Political mobilization population of Ukraine: condition and facts (at example of social-politics event 2013-2014). Panorama political study: Scieniens visn. RDHU, Rivne: RDHU, 145–153. [in Ukrainian].
Zlyvkov, V. (2005). Psychological victory: virtual and regalia facts “Pomarancheva revolution”. Social psychology, 3, 33–41. [in Ukrainian]